<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid Cable TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zanegee.com/2004/05/19/hybrid-cable-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zanegee.com/2004/05/19/hybrid-cable-tv/</link>
	<description>v3 :: &#34;So Fresh And So Clean&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:06:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.zanegee.com/2004/05/19/hybrid-cable-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanegee.com/2004/05/19/hybrid-cable-tv/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Uh...I don&#039;t think that would work. The amount of info that is passed through a &quot;cable&quot; connect is a lot more then a standard DSL line can hold. Your quality of TV would be compensated, along with those kewl search features that you get with digital cable. Just my $0.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;I don&#8217;t think that would work. The amount of info that is passed through a &#8220;cable&#8221; connect is a lot more then a standard DSL line can hold. Your quality of TV would be compensated, along with those kewl search features that you get with digital cable. Just my $0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

